<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Adversarial AI on AI VOID</title><link>https://ai-blog.noorshomelab.dev/tags/adversarial-ai/</link><description>Recent content in Adversarial AI on AI VOID</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ai-blog.noorshomelab.dev/tags/adversarial-ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Jailbreaking and Evasion Techniques: Bypassing Safeguards</title><link>https://ai-blog.noorshomelab.dev/ai-security-guide-2026/jailbreaking-evasion/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://ai-blog.noorshomelab.dev/ai-security-guide-2026/jailbreaking-evasion/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Welcome back, future AI security experts! In our last chapter, we delved into the world of Prompt Injection, where attackers try to manipulate an AI&amp;rsquo;s immediate instructions or context. Today, we&amp;rsquo;re taking on an even more insidious challenge: &lt;strong&gt;Jailbreaking and Evasion Techniques&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Think of it this way: if prompt injection is like tricking a security guard into opening a specific door, jailbreaking is like finding a master key or a hidden passage to bypass the entire security system designed to keep certain areas strictly off-limits. These techniques aim to make AI models, especially Large Language Models (LLMs) and AI agents, generate content or perform actions that they were explicitly designed to avoid, often for malicious purposes. This directly relates to &lt;strong&gt;OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, LLM01: Prompt Injection&lt;/strong&gt; (which encompasses jailbreaks) and &lt;strong&gt;LLM02: Insecure Output Handling&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Adversarial Testing (Red Teaming): Probing AI Vulnerabilities</title><link>https://ai-blog.noorshomelab.dev/ai-reliability-guide-2026/ai-adversarial-testing-red-teaming/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://ai-blog.noorshomelab.dev/ai-reliability-guide-2026/ai-adversarial-testing-red-teaming/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Welcome back, future AI reliability gurus! In our previous chapters, we explored the critical foundations of AI evaluation, from prompt testing to output validation and the crucial role of guardrails in maintaining safe AI behavior. We&amp;rsquo;ve built robust systems, but here&amp;rsquo;s a secret: truly robust systems are built by assuming they &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; be challenged.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today, we&amp;rsquo;re diving into one of the most proactive and fascinating aspects of AI safety: &lt;strong&gt;Adversarial Testing&lt;/strong&gt;, often known as &lt;strong&gt;Red Teaming&lt;/strong&gt;. Think of it as playing offense against your own AI system to uncover its hidden weaknesses before malicious actors do. We&amp;rsquo;ll learn how to deliberately challenge AI models, especially Large Language Models (LLMs), to expose vulnerabilities like prompt injection, hallucination bypasses, and unintended behaviors.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>